<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Default Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usawatchdog.com/default-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usawatchdog.com/default-option/</link>
	<description>Connecting the Dots to Give You A Clear Picture of What’s Really Going On</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fix The Banks! &#171; Jim Sinclair&#039;s Mineset</title>
		<link>http://usawatchdog.com/default-option/#comment-59809</link>
		<dc:creator>Fix The Banks! &#171; Jim Sinclair&#039;s Mineset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usawatchdog.com/?p=30#comment-59809</guid>
		<description>[...] In January of 2009, I wrote a piece called “Default Option.”&#160; I had the crazy idea that the big banks should be taken into receivership.&#160; Yes, shareholders and bond holders would have been wiped out.&#160; Tough—that’s investing.&#160; The only people you would have to protect are the depositors and, at the time, it would have cost $6 trillion.&#160; I said, “Letting those banks take the hit for their ill-advised, reckless investments based on greed will do many things.&#160; Here are just a few.&#160; Letting the reckless banks fail will limit taxpayer exposure, preserve our capital and our credit rating as a country. Bank failure will wash bad debt out of the system once and for all and protect the dollar from free fall.&#160; Finally, I think in the end it will be cheaper and more effective than what has and will be done in the future to “fix” the credit crisis.”&#160;&#160;  (Click here to read the original Default Option post.)&#160;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In January of 2009, I wrote a piece called “Default Option.”&#160; I had the crazy idea that the big banks should be taken into receivership.&#160; Yes, shareholders and bond holders would have been wiped out.&#160; Tough—that’s investing.&#160; The only people you would have to protect are the depositors and, at the time, it would have cost $6 trillion.&#160; I said, “Letting those banks take the hit for their ill-advised, reckless investments based on greed will do many things.&#160; Here are just a few.&#160; Letting the reckless banks fail will limit taxpayer exposure, preserve our capital and our credit rating as a country. Bank failure will wash bad debt out of the system once and for all and protect the dollar from free fall.&#160; Finally, I think in the end it will be cheaper and more effective than what has and will be done in the future to “fix” the credit crisis.”&#160;&#160;  (Click here to read the original Default Option post.)&#160;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

