WNW 167: Obama Immigration Amnesty, Jerusalem Violence, Ferguson Mo Decision

Al 11/21/2014  •

Barry becomes the first Illegal Alien President,
Barry Illegally makes Illegal Aliens legal,
Barry Pardons his Illegal Attorney General (when he comes up on charges)
Barry Pardons Illegals,
Barry Pardons himself!
President Lawless, the great destroyer.
America, you got what you’ve been asking for. Your own god; the son of the devil.
And he justifies everything he does, in his own mind, just you false “Christians” who serve Satan.

You asked for him,
You Got him,
the Devil!

Sensetti 11/21/2014  •

I believe Obama enjoys the discord he sows, his disdain for the American people is blatantly evident. This quote came to mind, it describe the mindset of Obama.

Habitual liars invent falsehoods not to gain any end or even to deceive their hearers, but to amuse themselves. It is partly practice and partly habit. It requires an effort in them to speak truth.
WILLIAM HAZLITT, Characteristics

Thanks Greg for all you do. I read every word you write. Keep up the much needed work.

Willard Ferch 11/21/2014  •

Just looking on at the age of 76. There will be peace in Jerusalem when one side or the other are all dead. Severe cooling, probable mini ice age, possible Ice Age is closing in.
The last major drought in the South West was 800 years ago, which lasted 85 years, and the Indians left the area. I check your site every day and learn a lot. Great way to learn what’s going on, especially with the economy. Thanks a million. Fiddlin

Mason 11/21/2014  •

The Netherlands have secretly repatriated 120 tons of their gold (or approximately 20% of their reserves) back from New York:
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2014/11/dutch-bring-120-tonnes-of-gold-back-to-amsterdam-from-new-york.php/

Smart move, if I might add!

Stephen Clifton 11/21/2014  •

Greg,
Why is anybody surprised by the actions of our government regardless of who is in office? This is the same government that has exchanged weapons for drugs in the 80s (and probably still today) to fund an illegal war in South America. The same government that supports authoritarian dictatorships (Saddam, Pinochet, Batista, Noriega etc.) while it serves their immediate agenda only to turn on them and invade sovereign nations in the name of protecting our “freedom”.
The same government that has taken control of our health care system with the cooperation of the insurance companies in exchange for the guaranteed tax dollars and increased premiums to the lower and middle classes. Hey Congress, why are you exempt?
The same elected officials who stand on the dead bodies of Americans to push personal power agendas such as gun control, healthcare, wars for freedom etc. Let me get this straight. Our only defense against our own government are our firearms and we are being made to give those up along with any other rights they determine a threat to their power? Don’t all of their kids have armed guards 24/7 and go to schools with armed guards but my kids aren’t worthy of the same protections? If the government puts down all of their guns then I will put down mine.
Our educational system being hijacked by the Feds to pass the ideas that our rights are not rights but “privileges the Federal government allows us to have”. So much for the Bill of Rights.
We are the frog in the boiling water waiting to die slowly. We are so busy fighting each other that nobody can see what is obviously going on. With every new law, speech, executive order our freedoms are being eroded.
At best the people in charge are sociopaths and at worst they are psychopaths. Either way this isn’t going to change until both sides of the debate realize that neither party has their best interests in mind.

Stephen Clifton

“Those who choose to give us liberty for security deserve neither and will lose both.”

Benjamin Franklin

MATILDA WALTZING 11/21/2014  •

PEOPLE OF THE LAST DAYS

Aside from identifying certain world developments, the Bible foretold that the last days would be marked by a change in human society. The apostle Paul described what people in general would be like. At 2 Timothy 3:1-5, we read: “In the last days critical times hard to deal with will be here.” In part, Paul said that people would be;
lovers of themselves

lovers of money

disobedient to parents

disloyal

having no natural affection

without self-control

fierce

lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God

having a form of godly devotion but proving false to its power

And what will happen to the wicked,
have people become like that in your community? No doubt they have! There are people everywhere going from bad to worse and will become even worse as things, get much worse. This all shows that God will soon act, for the Bible says: “When the wicked ones sprout as the vegetation and all the practicers of what is hurtful blossom forth, it is that they may be annihilated forever.”—Psalm 92:7 And forever is a long time, thank God!

Now Greg, that was short and sweet, wasn’t it?

Michael Harvey 11/22/2014  •

Thought for the Day Saturday 22nd November 2014
Loyalty to country ALWAYS. Loyalty to government, when it deserves it.
Peace be with you on this day
Mike

William Betts 11/22/2014  •

Greg:
It has become almost 100% accurate to lay the blame for 9/11 on George Bush and the Mossad. There are people out there that have all the evidence. It is amazing that this has been kept under raps this long. You have a very large readership that would like to get this info. Veterans Times editor has pretty much all the story. The neocons that control our foreign policy are controlled by the Israelis. We need a house cleaning in Washington. We need to take our country back and put all these people responsible for 9/11 in prison for the rest of their lives. The question to ask is, “Who benefits from 9/11?” Betts

Jeff L 11/23/2014  •

Paul says… ” and we could easily see more then a trillion dollars added to the Fed Balance Sheet “each and every year” forever into the future.

Every trillion dollars added to the Fed Balance Sheet equates to about $500 dollars being added to the gold price. ” Paul, we are already seeing 5-10 trillion “off budget” deficits. We will be looking at 10’s of Trillions annual deficits soon…….. The point I really wanted to make is we will soon start going exponential instead of linear. Debt has a way of compounding. Truth be known, even at zero % we are already spending our entire tax receipts on interest……….. NC gal …….. “black emperor” ? The other prerequisite to being the anti-Christ (imo) is being a muslim. Got that covered also.

Jeff L 11/23/2014  •

Yes, MATILDA. Like your ” last days” post, very informative, short and to the point. I was already going to commend you. Even Jesus didn’t have to quote a dozen scriptures to get his point across.

Brad 11/24/2014  •

Greg:
You need a place for your listeners to contact you regarding possible news stories that are unrelated to the interviews that you post.

I have such a “lead” which regards Pete and Doreen Hendrickson (Greater Detroit Area) and their website, Losthorizons.com, on which they sell several books including Cracking the Code.

Pete & Doreen’s story may very well be one of the most important stories in the last 100 years (that’s not hyperbole) and it is transpiring without any news coverage because the news is so corrupt and reporters are fearful to investigate highly controversial topics. The story is one of the most important battlefields for justice in our lifetimes.

Background:
CtC (Cracking the Code) is a detailed study of the 164 some Congressional Tax Laws that are summarized by the Internal Revenue Code which (of course) is used to applied the Federal Income Tax. Pete & Doreen have shown the IRC legal definitions in great detail (you can download this from the GPO.gov and read the elements of Title 26 yourself) showing that the Federal Income Tax is an EXCISE TAX on FEDERAL PRIVILEGE which is very constructional (just as the 16th amendment is constitutional) and all of these tax laws and the IRS’s IRC is all of it very lawful and constitutional.

Now at this point you might be confused. Why would there be a problem with someone showing how constitutional and lawful the Federal Income Tax really is? The problem is that a full understanding of exacting (and precisely) what the law actually says also shows clearly to whom the law applies – that is the problem since lies and deception have caused many to willingly (consent) to something that legally does not apply to them.

I’m sure this raises many red flags in your mind. Who is this guy making this post; who are Pete & Doreen Hendrickson? It’s insane to think this could be true – Let me be clear: This is NOT a Tax Protester issue – Pete & Doreen File annually.

Only a thorough investigation into these matters can open your eyes to the import of these events and this topic; an elucidation of the facts is what is needed.

I’ve recently send information to William Black and Paul Craig Roberts. They should be aware of this topic and these events. Pete & Doreen have meticulously documented the truth of the IRC using Title 26 and using US TAX LAW and the very fact that the USGOV is going to such great lengths to unlawfully and illegally prosecute them is proof that something is seriously wrong.

I’ve copied and pasted a note from Pete for your review. May God Almighty open your eyes.

This Is All That Matters Right Now

On December 10, the good guys come together, or a final nail goes into the rule of law’s coffin.

LET IT BE SAID PLAINLY: Forcing someone to declare herself indebted to another party– whether by court order or threat of penalty for not making such a declaration– is not a legitimate, lawful act of any organ of the state. Instead, it is a corrupt, tyrannical act, and prohibited by the United States Constitution’s speech, due process and equal protection provisions.

LET IT BE CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD: Compelling someone to declare a belief that her earnings are “income” taxable by the United States is compelling her to declare herself indebted to the United States (or to declare her agreement with material facts under which the tax debt then arises as a matter of law). Compelling someone to declare her earnings on a line in the “income” section of a testimonial document like a 1040– whether by direct command or by threat of a penalty for not doing so– is compelling her to declare a belief that those earnings are “income” and subject to the tax.

LET IT BE RECOGNIZED: If someone’s earnings ARE actually subject to the tax as a matter of law, and the government is aware of them sufficiently to command their declaration on a 1040, there can be no legitimate purpose for compelling their declaration, even were doing so not Constitutionally prohibited. Such an effort to compel can only serve a government interest if those earnings ARE NOT actually subject to the tax as a matter of law.

Earnings actually subject to the tax are so subject whether the recipient agrees or not. Compelling agreement with that fact is pointless as well as illegal. All the government needs to do is create its own return declaring the earnings to be “income” over a sworn signature– which it is, in fact, required to do by law if the recipient of the earnings hasn’t already agreed to the tax. Needless to say, this is both simpler, cheaper and easier than attempting to compel agreement from the recipient, and involves no Constitutional issues. (And again, it is mandated by law in any event).

Compulsion of declared “agreement” is only of use to the government where the earnings in question are NOT actually taxable. Its purpose is to eliminate the recipient’s ability to dispute the application of the tax to those earnings, and allow the government to proceed as though those earnings are taxable as a matter of law.

Declared agreement creates a false appearance of “no dispute over material facts”. The government is relieved of what otherwise would be its burdens of proof (or, more exactly, its obligation to walk away from the untaxable earnings and confine its attention to gains legitimately subject to the tax, in regard to which no coerced fiction of agreement is needed). The tax can then collected– improperly, but with a superficial appearance of legitimacy which is impenetrable by anyone not educated about the actual objects of the tax and how it is applied under the law.

BUT THERE COULD NEVER BE SUCH COMPELLED AGREEMENT IN AMERICA, you say! Such a thing could never happen here!!

Wrong. It IS happening here, right now. And you’d better pay attention and get involved.

HERE’S THE STORY: In 2006, the government was faced with the fact that CtC had laid bare its then-70-year-old “agreements secured by ignorance” program. Under that regime, Americans had for decades been misled into declaring their earnings to be subject to the tax with no illegal compulsion necessary, simply due to having no idea of the actual limits of the tax and of the legal effect of listing their earnings as “income” on a signed 1040.

Thanks to CtC, Americans were now declining to “agree” in ever-increasing numbers, and were routinely using those 1040s to instead demand– and receive– complete refunds of what had been inappropriately withheld from them in connection with the tax, Social Security and Medicare taxes included. In desperate response, the DOJ and IRS launched a project to test the depths to which judicial co-option would allow them to go in attempting to replace ignorance with compulsion.

The DOJ filed a lawsuit against me and my wife, Doreen. It claimed that refunds made to us of what had been withheld from me in 2002 and 2003 were just mistakes.

This claim was made despite elaborate IRS fussing over those refund claims before they were honored and despite the government’s inability to produce even an actual IRS “examination report” disputing our claims (it presented the court with a fake one, instead). The claim was made even though to this day– more than eight years since the suit was brought, and more than seven since the ruling for the government by the compliant court to which the ploy was entrusted– the government’s own Department of Treasury acknowledges that our refunds are correct, that nothing taxable was received in those years contrary to our returns, and that no tax has ever been owed.

But the government had a “workaround” for these problems. It asked the judge to declare “findings” of every “fact” alleged by the government, and to order Doreen and me to swear to agreement with them by replacing our freely-made tax returns with new ones on which we were to declare our belief in the truth of these “facts” (and to conceal that these declarations were coerced).

Further, because attacking CtC was the sole and real purpose of this suit, the government also asked for a “finding” that CtC claims that “wages” are not “income” and that only federal, state and local government workers are subject to the tax, and for an order prohibiting Doreen and me from filing returns based on these absurd notions falsely ascribed to the book. Together, the “findings” and the two orders would equip the DOJ and IRS to crow that “a court has ruled against CtC!”

With not so much as a single hearing, evidentiary or otherwise, the kept court issued the “findings” and orders asked for (and entirely written by) the government. (In a hearing three years later the judge claimed to have somehow misunderstood our dispute of the government’s assertions of facts as actually being agreement with them…)

We appealed, of course, but the appellate court responded by granting a government motion barring our memorandum detailing procedural flaws from being considered or going into the appellate record. This allowed the appellate panel to deem all the “found facts” to be true, and to therefore justify a denial of the appeal. The Supreme Court elected to not make our case one of the .007% of petitions received each year it would hear.

THUS FREED FROM FEAR THAT A COURT would act to stop it (and there being virtually zero attention to any of this in the media), the DOJ doubled-down. In late 2008, it charged me with filing “false returns” based on the proposition that I didn’t really believe my earnings shouldn’t be declared as “income” (under the “wages” label or otherwise) on my tax forms.

The government’s key “evidence” was 743 pages of government filings in the lawsuit. All were admitted by the judge without a testifying (and examinable) witness involved; the docs with all their government-serving allegations and conclusions were just handed over to the jury.

The featured item was the ruling by the court in that suit, in which my earnings were “found” to be what the government had asked the court to say (and CtC was “found” to say what it does not). That was not enough, though– the government also felt obliged to deny the jury the actual statutory definitions of things like “wages”, and to have it specifically instructed to deliberate using prosecution-written substitute definitions which essentially declared my earnings to be “wages” (unlike the actual definitions), and obliged the jury to conclude that I must have believed my earnings to be “wages” when I said by way of my forms that I didn’t.

NEEDLESS (I HOPE) TO SAY, no one who had read CtC was fooled or intimidated by this kangaroo proceeding (something doubtless helped along by the fact that even as I cooled my heels for the next two years, CtC-readers across the country continued to receive their complete refunds without interruption, rather decisively proving which set of definitions was actually the right one). So, in 2013, the government doubled-down yet again.

In June of that year my wife Doreen was arrested and charged with “criminal contempt of court” for alleged willful disobedience to the orders issued in the lawsuit 6 years prior. That is, Doreen was charged with a crime for not letting herself be compelled to declare a belief that her earnings are subject to the tax.

The first trial was held in October of 2013. Doreen defended herself.

Faced with the problem of the orders Doreen is accused of resisting being manifestly unlawful, the government asked for an instruction barring the jury from considering the unlawfulness or unconstitutionality of the orders in deliberations.

Even then the government knew it couldn’t get a guilty verdict. So it also asked that the jury also be told it needn’t unanimously agree that Doreen had actually committed either of the two distinct acts of contempt alleged in the indictment– one, failing to submit “amended returns” for 2002 and 2003 declaring a belief that her earnings were taxable, and two, filing a return the government alleged was based on the absurd notion falsely ascribed to CtC that only federal, state and local government workers are subject to the income tax (this was a return filed in 2009 for a $5 refund of withholdings from Doreen’s $59 of W-2-reported earnings in 2008, which the government, after its standard thorough vetting of her claim, had duly issued).

That trial, conducted against Doreen by a team of DOJ specialists brought into Detroit from Washington to do the mugging, ended in a hung jury.

This wouldn’t do for the tyranny-interests, so they tried a second time, in July of 2014. Again, Doreen defended herself. Again, the special instructions were given to the jury removing the “lawfulness” issue (even though it is a specific statutory element of “contempt” crimes) and sparing the government from its actual unanimous verdict burden.

But this time the government also saw to it that Doreen was not permitted to make her Opening Statement, or to finish her Closing Argument. This time she was prevented from citing and reading to the jurors Supreme Court opinions on speech rights specifically declaring unconstitutional orders like those she was accused of believing herself to be under a valid legal duty to obey but violating anyway– the legal standard for a contempt charge.

To top it all off, this time, in the closing minutes of the trial, the prosecutors produced what they claimed to be evidence that, contrary to Doreen’s testimony on the subject, the government had never actually pursued– and then abandoned– efforts to enjoin CtC shortly after it appeared in print (which of course, it actually had). Unable to prove that this “evidence” was actually a government misrepresentation until later, Doreen’s reliability as a witness and a key fact involved in the defense theory of the case appeared to be impeached. (Find more discussion, documentation and relevant motions concerning many of these unprecedented attacks on due process here.)

With all of that, this time the jury returned a guilty verdict.

All of the foregoing should be enough to outrage and make deeply concerned any and every adult American. Plainly, this is a horrendous assault on the rule of law, and one being practiced in order to keep everyone from learning about the most significant government scam and abuse in our country’s history– the systemic mis-application of the income tax to the tune of trillions of dollars scammed out of the pockets of their rightful owners and into the hands of the political class and its clients and cronies.

But there is one additional aspect of this assault on the rule of law that goes even beyond just the First Amendment and due process/equal protection issues, and the purely practical issues of all that money being snookered away. This other thing, which ought to chill you to the very bone if you’ve got your wits about you, is this: The concept rested on by the government for why it was okay to dictate and command Doreen’s statements of belief was that she is only being told to say what she herself really believes to be true. After all, a judge has said it. Therefore, Doreen must believe it, too.

Over and over, throughout the trial, the US attorneys kept saying Doreen was only being ordered to “say what was correct”. Their Closing Argument was little more than pounding on the podium and shouting that Doreen was told what was correct by the judge, and so how could the jury imagine that she could honestly believe otherwise?!

Think about that, and tremble.

An “official” has said it, therefore it must be true, therefore you can be forced to say you believe it, too– even on a legal form that controls who gets to keep or claim your property.

That’s exactly the same sick and twisted crap we once rightly denounced in the old Soviet Union, where people who dissented against the party line were deemed mentally ill and made wards of the state, without rights. Here it is in America– if you don’t do something about it.

SO HERE’S THE THING, PEOPLE– THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS NOW. On December 10, at 1:30 PM, in the courtroom of Victoria Roberts in the Theodore Levin Federal Building in downtown Detroit, my beautiful and good Doreen is due to be sentenced for the alleged “crime” of not letting herself be compelled to declare a belief the government wants her forced to avow, and punished for not avowing.

Be there, making yourself heard and seen, and until then, be raising one hell of a racket with journalists and the legal community– especially organizations that profess to be “public interest”. If not, don’t cry to me when your turn comes.

When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.

-Edmund Burke