Update: Kevin Shipp Destroys Hammer Hoax

Former CIA Officer and whistleblower Kevin Shipp has new material on the so-called “Hammer” (Hamr) surveillance. Shipp gives extensive documented proof that both Dennis Montgomery and his super-secret program are a hoax. This story has been pushed for nearly three years on other channels, and Shipp has been attacked for telling the truth about this false story.  Please watch Kevin Shipp professionally dismantle this bogus story so we can all concentrate on the real NSA data abuse used to try to remove President Trump from office.   (This is a brand new updated video (7/2/19) with much more new information.)

After the Presentation:

Kevin Shipp’s website is called FortheLoveofFreedom.net.

To join Shipp’s Patreon channel click here.

To support Kevin Shipp who lost his pension because he became a whistleblower click here.

To get a copy of Shipp’s book “From the Company of Shadows” click here.  His book uncovers and teaches all about the Deep State and the Shadow Government

Stay Connected
  1. Doug Cook

    Thanks for this Greg. Anyone can be fooled including very skilled and dedicated Orthopedic Surgeons. A humble doctor not driven by ego and not trained as an intelligence analyst will eat some crow and admit they were taken for a ride. I hope Dr. Janda has the integrity I think he has. We shall see. And I know it’s not easy for your to have to share this but you have integrity and are going to go where the hard evidence leads and your stock has gone up in my estimation.

    • Greg Hunter

      Sad thing here Doug is Shipp notified Janda months ago on a at least couple of different occasions via email of the problems of “Hamr.” Shipp was actually warning Dr. Janda of the huge problems of the Montgomery hoax. Instead of listening, Dr. Janda goes on the air and casts dispersions on Shipp after I interview him on why Montgomery and “Hamr” are both a hoax. Shipp only wanted to correct the record so we all focus on the real NSA data abuse story.

      Shipp is a real deal former CIA Officer and whistleblower who had very high security clearances. One example, he protected the CIA Director at his home for more than a year. How high does your clearance need to be to do that?? Thank you for your support.

      • Uncommon Sense

        Greg, these playground arguments and all the political stuff is boring!!! Can you just focus on economics?

        • William Stanley

          I assume that you are being ironic. They used to call it “POLITICAL economy,” as I recall (yes, I am very old, lol).

      • Rob

        I don’t think many of us truly understand how far our Father will go to separate truth from lawlessness:

        Matthew 10:34-39 Think not that I came to send peace on the earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. (35) For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law: (36) and a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. (37) He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. (38) And he that doth not take his cross and follow after me, is not worthy of me. (39) He that findeth his life shall lose it; and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.

        The Sword is the Word that separates truth from lawlessness:


      • Doug

        Cui Bono; ‘who does it benefit?’

        It doesn’t benefit Dr. Janda to knowingly present false information. It could of benefitted a con artist like Montgomery and it might benefit certain agencies that would like to deflect from what they did and put it on someone/something else.

        Dr. Janda was trained to mend broken bodies and broken bones. He wasn’t trained as an intelligence analyst or as an investigative reporter like yourself. Janda was probably showed rudimentary documentation of Montgomery’s clearance from years ago and what Montgomery stated sounded ‘good’. Not having the benefit of knowing how to check out a story Janda went with it. I doubt you would single source a story this important without excellent supporting documentation and very strong circumstantial evidence. Dr. Janda just didn’t have the training to spot this for what it is.

        Problem for Dr. Dave is he has invested a lot in this explanation over the last few years and now he feels that his credibility is on the line. He has a popular radio show on a commercial station and an extensive following. Human nature being what it is with ego involved one can either admit the error and take your lumps or double down to save face. To be a great surgeon you need a lot of ego as it seems to be a qualification to do the almost impossible and Dr. Janda was a great surgeon from what I’ve read.

        We don’t need big ego’s in our community as the stakes are too high and we certainly don’t need infighting by those who desire truth above all. Dr. Janda has to understand t